Taking Times Out: Tense Logic as a Theory of Time

نویسنده

  • Thomas Pashby
چکیده

Ulrich Meyer’s fascinating book The Nature of Time uses a novel development of Arthur Prior’s tense logic to argue for a ‘modal’ account of time. Meyer’s metaphysical view requires tense primitivism (the view that truths are irreducibly tensed) and so, in Quine’s turn of phrase, trades ontology for ideology. Meyer’s temporal metaphysics eschews ontological commitment to temporal instants through the introduction of so-called ‘ersatz times,’ developed in analogy with the ersatz possible worlds of modal logic. In modal logic, linguistic ersatzism about possible worlds is associated with actualism (the thesis that only actual objects and events exist) so one might expect an advocate of ersatz times to endorse presentism (the thesis that only present objects and events exist). Many philosophers of physics (myself included) take presentism to be inconsistent with special relativity. Meyer, however, argues that the analogy between presentism and actualism is weak, and denies the presentist’s claim that the present is metaphysical privileged. Furthermore, Meyer claims that relativity allows for the introduction of ‘hybrid views’ that combine distinct, seemingly incompatible metaphysical accounts of time and space. In particular, Meyer advocates a metaphysics of relativistic spacetime that combines spatial substantivalism with his ‘modal’ view of time. The argument of the book follows an almost Aristotelian methodology. First, in Chapter 1, the desiderata for a theory of time are outlined. Next, rival metaphysical theories are dismissed one by one: varieties of temporal relationalism in Chapter 2, and temporal substantivalism in Chapter 3. Then the preferred theory is outlined (in Chapters 4, 6 and 8) and declared the victor, with the rest of the book devoted to showing how remaining difficulties may be accommodated. In particular, there are chapters that deal with temporal propositions and truthmakers (Chapter 5), temporal structure (Chapter 7), presentism (Chapter 9), becoming (Chapter 10), motion (Chapter 11) and relativity theory (Chapter 12).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Times in Tense Logic

Tense logic is often said to possess insufficient expressive resources to serve as a theory of the nature of time. This paper counters this objection by showing how to obtain quantification over times in a tense logic in which all temporal distinctions are ultimately spelled out in terms of the two simple tense operators “it was the case that” and “it will be the case that.” This account of tim...

متن کامل

The Language of Special Relativity

The Special Theory of Relativity is often interpreted as forcing us to accept a conceptual revolution in our thinking about space, time, and the temporal distinction between past, present, and future. Most importantly, it is claimed that the notion of absolute simultaneity that is embodied in our pre-relativistic thinking about time must be abandoned. Thus, our natural language use of linguisti...

متن کامل

The Syntactic Expression of Tense Tim Stowell

2 Abstract In this article I defend the view that many central aspects of the semantics of tense are determined by independently-motivated principles of syntactic theory. I begin by decomposing tenses syntactically into a temporal ordering predicate (the true tense, on this approach) and two time-denoting arguments corresponding to covert a reference time (RT) argument and an eventuality time (...

متن کامل

Tense, propositions, and facts

There are two ways of incorporating temporal distinctions into a system of logic: tensed theories propose to expand standard logic with intensional tense operators; tenseless theories try to make do with the resources of extensional first-order logic, by using quantification over suitably chosen temporal entities, such as metaphysically basic time points or temporal parts. My concern in this pa...

متن کامل

Worlds and Times

There are many parallels between the role of possible worlds in modal logic and that of times in tense logic. But the similarities only go so far, and it is important to note where the two come apart. This paper argues that even though worlds and times play similar roles in the model theories of modal and tense logic, there is no tense analogue of the possible-worlds analysis of modal operators...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015